Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein’s longtime associate and convicted accomplice, was a familiar face at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago in the late 1990s and early 2000s. She frequented the luxurious spa, booking appointments under Epstein’s account and even charging her own services to it. But Maxwell’s visits went beyond pampering herself; former employees reveal she cleverly transformed the spa into a covert recruitment ground, targeting financially struggling young workers – often broke teenagers – with promises of quick cash for “massages” and side jobs at Epstein’s mansion.
These unauthorized offers were enticing to low-wage spa staff: extra money for private sessions with Maxwell’s “friend.” Unbeknownst to many, this was part of Epstein and Maxwell’s methodical grooming operation. One infamous case was Virginia Giuffre, recruited in 2000 at age 16 while working as a spa attendant. Maxwell approached her, noting her interest in massage therapy, and lured her into Epstein’s world of abuse.
The spa’s own practices unwittingly aided this. Mar-a-Lago occasionally sent young female employees on house calls to Epstein’s nearby Palm Beach home for services like massages and manicures. Staff knew Epstein’s reputation – he was brazenly inappropriate, exposing himself and making creepy advances during appointments. Warnings circulated informally among workers, yet the house calls persisted for years, with staff turning a blind eye to maintain the club’s operations.
How deep did this complicity run? Employees describe a culture where concerns were whispered but not escalated. Epstein’s behavior was an open secret among spa workers, who cautioned each other, but management continued dispatching them. Maxwell’s recruitment pitches for “side jobs” were not club-sanctioned, yet they happened right under the nose of staff. Even Trump’s ex-wife Marla Maples raised alarms in the mid-1990s, telling employees Epstein seemed “wrong” and “off.”
The unraveling began in 2003 when an 18-year-old beautician returned from a house call in distress, reporting to managers that Epstein had pressured her for sex. This complaint prompted a fax to Trump detailing the incident and recommending a ban. Trump agreed, calling it a “good letter” and ordering Epstein and Maxwell barred from the spa – effectively ending the house calls and recruitment pipeline from Mar-a-Lago.
Remarkably, despite years of red flags – exposures, advances, Maxwell’s enticements, and now this direct allegation – no police report was filed. The club handled it internally, prioritizing a ban over alerting authorities. This silence meant Epstein’s broader crimes remained hidden from law enforcement until 2005.
Trump has consistently stated he cut ties upon learning of Epstein’s misconduct, later describing him as a creep and noting the poaching of staff like Giuffre. Some accounts point to a full club ban possibly in 2007 after another incident, but the 2003 spa cutoff was pivotal.
The complicity wasn’t overt malice but a toxic brew: deference to a high-profile guest, fear of disrupting the elite club’s harmony, and underestimation of the danger. Staff turned a blind eye to survive the job; management avoided scandal. Maxwell exploited this vulnerability, preying on broke teens desperate for cash.
In hindsight, as Epstein’s trafficking network claimed dozens of victims and Maxwell was convicted in 2021, Mar-a-Lago’s role highlights systemic failures. How many warnings were ignored before one complaint forced change? The depth of complicity – from quiet tolerance to internal resolution without police involvement – allowed Epstein’s predation to flourish unchecked for years.
Trump’s ban ultimately severed the connection, a decisive step when confronted with evidence. Yet the episode exposes how institutions catering to the powerful can inadvertently enable predators, delaying justice and leaving young workers exposed.
Leave a Reply