In a chilling expose that unveils Mar-a-Lago’s hidden dangers, teenage spa workers were repeatedly dispatched to Jeffrey Epstein’s nearby mansion for private massages and services—despite urgent whispers among staff warning of his sexually suggestive behavior and shocking incidents of indecent exposure. Former employees reveal the glamorous resort’s dark practice continued for years, even though Epstein wasn’t a member, with young women quietly alerting each other to the risks. It all came to a traumatic halt in 2003 when an 18-year-old beautician returned distraught, reporting that Epstein had pressured her for sex during a house call—a complaint that finally prompted Trump to ban him. Yet the incident was never reported to police, leaving survivors’ advocates furious. This bombshell raises haunting questions: How many warnings were ignored, and what else lurks in the shadows of elite power?
Chilling Exposé Unveils Hidden Dangers at Mar-a-Lago: Spa Workers Sent to Epstein’s Mansion Amid Warnings of Inappropriate Behavior
A disturbing investigation has uncovered a long-standing practice at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort, where young spa employees—many of them teenagers—were regularly sent to Jeffrey Epstein’s nearby Palm Beach mansion for private massages and beauty services, despite persistent staff warnings about his sexually inappropriate behavior and incidents of indecent exposure. The revelations, detailed in a Wall Street Journal report published December 30, 2025, reveal how this arrangement continued for years in the early 2000s, even though Epstein was never an official member of the exclusive club.
Former Mar-a-Lago employees told the Journal that Trump directed staff to treat Epstein “like a member,” granting him an internal spa account primarily booked by his associate Ghislaine Maxwell. Licensed cosmetologists and massage therapists, often in their late teens or early twenties, were dispatched on house calls to Epstein’s estate just two miles away. Over time, workers quietly warned one another about the dangers, describing Epstein’s conduct as overtly sexual and recounting instances where he exposed himself during sessions. Some employees raised concerns with managers, questioning why Epstein could not simply come to the resort’s spa instead.
The practice directly connected Mar-a-Lago to Epstein’s predatory activities. In 2000, Maxwell approached 16-year-old Virginia Giuffre, then working as a spa attendant at the club, and recruited her to become a massage therapist for Epstein—an opportunity Giuffre later alleged led to years of sexual abuse and trafficking. The Journal also identified four additional former Mar-a-Lago employees listed in Epstein’s address book seized by the FBI in 2009. Even Trump’s then-wife, Marla Maples, reportedly expressed unease in the mid-1990s, warning staff and her husband that Epstein gave her an uncomfortable feeling.
The arrangement came to an abrupt end in 2003 after a traumatic incident involving an 18-year-old beautician. She returned from a house call visibly distraught and reported to managers that Epstein had pressured her for sex. A manager faxed the complaint to Trump, who reportedly described it as “a good letter” and immediately ordered Epstein and Maxwell barred from using spa services. However, former employees and Palm Beach authorities confirmed the allegation was never reported to police. Local law enforcement only launched an investigation into Epstein two years later, following a separate complaint involving a 14-year-old girl.
The White House has strongly rejected the Journal’s reporting as filled with “fallacies and innuendo,” with Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt stating that “President Trump did nothing wrong and he kicked Jeffrey Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago for being a creep.”
Survivors’ advocates have condemned the failure to report the 2003 allegation and the years of overlooked warnings, arguing that elite venues like Mar-a-Lago enabled Epstein’s crimes by prioritizing access for influential figures. The disclosures emerge as the Justice Department continues releasing Epstein-related documents under the 2025 transparency law, amid ongoing criticism of redactions and delays.
The exposé highlights the risks faced by young workers in luxury environments and the challenges of holding powerful individuals accountable when institutional protections are in place.
Leave a Reply